I have been giving a great deal of thought to perception lately, how things are perceived, and how that can very much deviate from initial intentions. It’s not merely about knowing your audience, especially when they can be so open they defy definition (example: open blogging on teh internets).
This recent obsessive thought process started during my Monday night class a few weeks ago, when we were discussing an article written by the professor. Now, I confess, I am not a fan of assigned readings written by the person teaching the class, but I get the relevance. Although it does bring up a discourse that detracts from the reading, arguments can be made for how it works, especially within the context of this particular course.
To get a little meta with it, if meta is the correct terminology here, this exact dynamic came to mind while reading the professor’s article. An example was cited that made me think, “Oh wait, is that a good example?” As it turned out, when I asked the professor about this, because of the positive perceptions as a result of the example, it is effective. However, he then had to state specifically in the paper that due to the positive public perception, the example works, but only within the given context. Complicated, right? I wanted to play devil’s advocate for a moment, but decided against it because had it not been a favorable outcome, I realized the example would probably have not been used in the article in the first place. Also, playing devil’s advocate when it was the professor’s own work? Yeah, not exactly advocating for my success in the classroom.
The point is, this little exchange planted a seed about perception in my head. Of course, I have been considering it in broader realms than the classroom, as well as smaller realms, like the public perception of my blog. I have no idea what people think of it, who reads it, other than my mother, and a friend or two who mentioned they added me to their google reader list. And honestly, that’s perfectly fine by me.
So, who am I writing for? I can’t say it’s for an audience, really. It’s mostly for myself, to skim ideas about my own writing process off my mind, to try to figure out what works for me and what doesn’t. That more or less labels it a self-indulgent writing exercise, but I think that is okay, for the time-being.
In the meantime, I am diving into some more deep literary theory articles, and learning as much as I can about the process of writing, and what it takes to become a more effective storyteller. I shall defer the spinning of yarns to my kitty cats.